dennnis - i love them both. Its taken me a whole to appreciate still life paintings - principly through doing them myslef and balancing the juxposition of the various elements to keep the whole balanced is tricky. I like the "roundness" you've managed to create on the jugs - can't think of the correct term

but I'm sure you can work out what i mean.
as for the comment about mutual stroking - well maybe it was a bit sharp to put it that way but in general I agree that the purpose of critique is to learn, to improve and to use the third eye of another person to point out faults. This can be done in a nonjudgemntal way - not " urghh its horrible" - that's no help at all but some proper helpful comments about whats not so good as well as whats worked well is useful to all of us. no-one is perfect
If the only comment is "perfect, lovely , beautuful " etc then thats good for the ego but not helping people to learn and inprove and I think thats such a valuable part of any forum. I've certainly learned much from putting artwork up for critique and had some valuble advice from other artists.
I'm not sure about the feather in the first one - its obviously there for a reason but to me it catches my eye too much as seems out of sync with the rest of the objects.
On the second pic I can't work out what the T shaped object is - it looks like maybe a wooden support or something but not knowing what jars a bit..